BEYOND ONBOARDING: FRAUD PREVENTION IS A CONTINUOUS PROCESS  

For years, digital identity has been treated as a doorway: verify the customer at onboarding, tick the compliance boxes, and assume the same person remains in control. But most serious fraud doesn’t happen at the front door. It happens after trust has already been granted, during account recovery, device changes, beneficiary updates, SIM swaps, and other “privileged moments” that attackers know are less protected than onboarding. 

That’s the mindset shift leaders need now: identity is not a moment in time. It’s a control surface. And in modern digital services, control surfaces must be available continuously; quietly, selectively, and embedded inside the journey. 

From customer onboarding to everyday identification 

Remote onboarding has matured: document capture, liveness checks, and reference identity creation are now standard in many markets. The mistake is treating that reference identity as archival. In high-risk operations, the question is rarely “Who was this customer when they signed up?” It’s “Is the legitimate customer in control right now?” 
Daily-use identity builds on the reference identity and reuses it when confidence needs to be raised. Not for every action, only for the actions that matter. 
Typical examples include: 
Financial services 
  • approving high-value payments or unusual transfers 
  • changing payees/beneficiaries or payment limits 
  • updating personal data (address, phone, email) 
  • provisioning payment credentials to a new device/wallet 
  • account recovery (especially when the original device is lost) 
Telecom 
  • SIM/eSIM swap and activation 
  • number porting (port-out) 
  • device change tied to account access 
  • ownership transfer / account takeover recovery 
  • high-impact profile changes (contact details, authentication factors) 

These events share a pattern: they change who can access value. Attackers target them because they often sit outside the “hardened” onboarding flow and rely on weaker methods (SMS codes, knowledge-based checks, or inconsistent call-center processes). 

The real battleground: recovery and change events 

Executives often ask, “Do we need stronger onboarding?” Sometimes yes. But the bigger question is: Do we have strong controls at the moments where fraud monetizes? 

Account takeover typically follows a predictable chain: 

  1. attacker gains a foothold (phishing, malware, social engineering, leaked credentials) 
  1. attacker triggers a change event (new device, new contact details, SIM swap) 
  1. attacker completes a value event (payment, purchase, payout, data extraction) 

If you only validate identity at step 0, you leave steps 2–3 exposed. Daily-use identity is a way to close that gap: bring high-assurance recognition to the events that actually shift control. 

Invisible when safe, decisive when risk rises 

The goal is not to “verify more.” The goal is to verify smarter. 

Daily-use identity succeeds when it acts as a risk-based step-up: 

  • routine actions remain frictionless 
  • unusual behavior quietly triggers additional assurance 
  • high-impact actions require a strong proof of presence 

This is also where many programs fail: they apply step-up broadly, creating unnecessary drop-off, customer frustration, and call-center load. A modern approach is to couple identity with risk signals such as: 

  • new device or browser fingerprint 
  • new geolocation or network 
  • anomalous transaction patterns 
  • change of payee/contact details 
  • recovery attempts, especially following failed logins 
  • telecom-specific signals like SIM/eSIM changes or port-out activity 

When risk rises, the system asks for a high-assurance, fast confirmation, not another password or a brittle one-time code. 

A practical decision framework for leaders 

If you’re designing identity for everyday use, three design choices matter more than the vendor label: 

1) Triggering: Where do you step up? 

Define the handful of events where assurance must increase. Most organizations don’t need 50 step-ups; they need 5–10 critical ones aligned to fraud and loss drivers. 

2) Assurance: How do you prove “the right person is present”? 

For everyday use, assurance must be both high-confidence and low-friction. If it blocks legitimate users, it becomes a support problem. If it’s lenient, it becomes a fraud channel. The bar is: fast, consistent, and repeatable, because daily-use identity is invoked often. 

3) Fallback: What happens when it fails? 

Every high-assurance mechanism needs an escalation path: trusted recovery, customer support workflows, and clear handling of edge cases (camera issues, accessibility needs, device constraints). Fallback design is not an afterthought, it’s part of security. 

Embedded identity is the new infrastructure 

Daily-use identity works best when it is embedded inside the service, mobile and web, without redirects, manual checks, or “go somewhere else to prove who you are.” That means secure SDK-level integration, hardened backend services, encrypted data flows, and support for data-residency and regulatory constraints. 

When identity becomes infrastructure, it becomes: 

  • always available (for the moments that matter) 
  • rarely visible (when risk is low) 
  • consistently auditable (for compliance and incident response) 

The direction of travel: recognition becomes normal 

In the near future, confirming who you are will feel as natural as opening an app, not because security relaxes, but because security becomes contextual and habit-forming. Organizations that treat identity as a continuous control, especially around recovery and change events, will reduce fraud while improving customer experience. 

How Candour fits this transition? 

Daily-use identity requires a verification method that is strong enough for high-risk events but smooth enough for frequent use. Candour is designed for exactly this “onboarding-to-everyday” shift: fast selfie-based verification that can be used not only for initial onboarding, but also for step-up at critical moments like high-value approvals, device changes, and account recovery, or even at every sign in.  

If you’re currently mapping fraud journeys and deciding where to place high-assurance step-up in 2026, we’re happy to share a reference architecture and discuss which events typically deliver the highest impact.

 Get in Touch